Show new navigation
On
Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
SOW Report
Contract 74314 REL 101: 1995-063-25 EXP YAKIMA RIVER M&E - WDFW
Project Number:
Title:
Yakima River Monitoring and Evaluation-Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP)
BPA PM:
Stage:
Implementation
Area:
Province Subbasin %
Columbia Plateau Yakima 100.00%
Contract Number:
74314 REL 101
Contract Title:
1995-063-25 EXP YAKIMA RIVER M&E - WDFW
Contract Continuation:
Previous: Next:
74314 REL 67: 1995-063-25 EXP YAKIMA RIVER M&E - WDFW
Contract Status:
Closed
Contract Description:
The YKFP is a joint project of the Yakama Nation (lead entity) and the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and is sponsored in large part by the Bonneville Power Administration with oversight and guidance from the Northwest Power and Conservation Council (NPCC). The YKFP experimental design for the supplementation research and Coho reintroduction feasibility projects was developed in 1996. We propose to continue to test whether new artificial production techniques, coupled with strategic habitat actions, can be used to increase harvest and natural production of Yakima Basin spring Chinook while maintaining the long-term genetic fitness of the population being supplemented and keeping adverse genetic and ecological interactions with non-target species or stocks within acceptable limits. We propose to evaluate the domesticating effects of supplementation, and compare the intensity of domestication incurred under supplementation as practiced i... n the YKFP spring chinook program to a wild control line and to that incurred under a more conventional regime of continuous hatchery culture. The experimental designs are adjusted periodically based on the results of the M&E activities. The project is also designed to provide knowledge about supplementation so that it may be used to mitigate effects on anadromous fisheries throughout the Columbia River Basin.

Before the ocean and lower Columbia exploitation of salmon and steelhead in the late 19th century and early 20th century, and before the Yakima River valley was developed, the Yakima Subbasin supported large runs of spring, summer and fall Chinook, summer steelhead, coho and sockeye. Historic spring Chinook returns to the Yakima were likely in the range of 202,500 (Mullan 1983) to approximately 250,000 fish (Smoker 1956). Cumulative effects from the disruption of the Yakima Subbasin ecosystem functions and processes, out of subbasin impacts, and harvest of salmon have resulted in a significant decline of fish and wildlife abundance from historic levels. Presently, adult salmon and steelhead returns to the Yakima River are approximately two orders of magnitude lower than estimated historic returns. The significant decrease in abundance of these fish is mirrored on the terrestrial landscape. Though abundance data is limited for the terrestrial focal species, many important wildlife habitats have been significantly constricted and degraded (YSFWPB 2004a), thus limiting the population potential of wildlife that depend on these habitats. At the most general levels, the main habitat factors in focal species’ decline within this subbasin are the loss of key habitat quantity, quality, and diversity (YSFWPB 2004a).

Meaningful restoration of salmon and steelhead runs in the Columbia Basin ultimately requires a return to “normative” conditions throughout the basin (Williams et al., 1996), or at least to a much more normative state. Because of the enormous societal obstacles and economic costs that constrain it, such an effort will take decades to implement and additional decades to take effect. Therefore, mitigation measures such as supplementation will likely be required for the foreseeable future to meet federal treaty trust and other obligations embodied in the FWP (BPA 1996). Ultimately, the YKFP will comprise a series of complimentary habitat restoration and supplementation/reintroduction projects targeting all species historically present in the subbasin.

Research, monitoring and evaluation activities are necessary to develop information to make decisions regarding salmon and steelhead stock protection and restoration objectives in the Yakima Basin. The YKFP is using adaptive management to guide Project decisions. Adaptive management requires the development and analysis of information regarding performance of strategies and methods.

Supplementation is being pursued as a key strategy for stock enhancement and restoration throughout the Columbia Basin. As defined by RASP (1991), supplementation is “the use of artificial propagation in an attempt to maintain or increase natural production while maintaining long-term fitness of the target population and keeping ecological and genetic impacts to non-target species within specified limits”. The Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP 2005-15) stated, “The critical uncertainties are whether supplementation provides a demographic increase in natural production (the potential benefit) and whether supplementation leads to decreased natural-spawning fitness (the potential harm) in the integrated population. Supplementation entails demographic, genetic (fitness), ecological, and disease risks.” This Project is designed to evaluate these uncertainties and risks. The results of the monitoring and evaluation activities in the Yakima subbasin will be useful for evaluation, design, development and implementation of supplementation programs elsewhere in the Columbia Basin. However, as noted in the Yakima Subbasin Management Supplement (YSFWPB 2004b, p. 36), the use of supplementation will not, by itself, create a sustainable, naturally-producing population of salmonids in a watershed where the indigenous wild population has been diminished or extirpated. Habitat quality is the sole determinant of natural population productivity and sustainability. If supplementation ceases without changing the underlying habitat conditions that required its use in the first place, the remaining, unsupplemented, naturally-producing population will be expected to resume the decline that was apparent before the application of supplementation. Only adequate habitat quality can ensure the long-term viability of unsupplemented, naturally-producing populations. The related YKFP Management, Data, and Habitat proposal (198812025) includes objectives and strategies for addressing habitat projects.

With respect to the significance of the Project to regional programs, the research, monitoring and evaluation activities are important to achievement of the fisheries mitigation requirements that are required by the Northwest Power Act (NPA) and implemented through the FWP and subbasin plan. The fisheries mitigation requirements have framed the historical monitoring and evaluation activities in the Yakima Basin. The proposed activities are also aligned with current NPCC efforts to increase the regional effectiveness of research, monitoring and evaluation activities.
  
Account Type(s):
Expense
Contract Start Date:
05/01/2020
Contract End Date:
04/30/2021
Current Contract Value:
$1,165,597
Expenditures:
$1,165,597

* Expenditures data includes accruals and are based on data through 31-Mar-2025.

Env. Compliance Lead:
Work Order Task(s):
Contract Type:
Release
Pricing Method:
Cost Reimbursement (CNF)
MarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarkerMarker
30 km
20 mi
Click the map to see this Contract's location details.

No photos have been uploaded yet for this Contract.

Viewing 15 of 15 Work Statement Elements
Sort Order
WSEV ID
WE ID
Work Element Name
Title
Description
WSE Effective Budget
% of Total WSE Effective Budget
WSE Start
WSE End
A215038185Produce CBFish Status ReportPeriodic Status Reports for BPAThe Contractor shall report on the status of milestones and deliverables in Pisces. Reports shall be completed either monthly or quarterly as determined by the BPA COTR. Additionally, when indicating a deliverable milestone as COMPLETE, the contractor shall provide metrics and the final location (latitude and longitude) prior to submitting the report to the BPA COTR.$5,0000.43%07/01/202004/30/2021
B215039119Manage and Administer ProjectsManage and Administer Yakima Basin M&EProject personnel will provide the management and administration necessary to complete this contract with excellence. Most of this work is conducted under 1995-064-25. The contractor will need to use the Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership's Monitoring Methods, Metrics, and Indicators website (PNAMP), http://www.monitoringmethods.org/, to update or create protocols, add data repository information, and add the area of inference/study. Pisces will include an RM&E metrics tab that must be filled in to include queues for additional RM&E metrics.$45,0003.86%05/01/202004/30/2021
C215040132Produce Progress (Annual) ReportYakima Basin M&E Annual Report Jan-Dec 2020Prepare annual reports documenting the accomplishments and results of evaluation and monitoring studies supported by this contract. This WE organizes the finalization of the 2020 Annual M&E Report.$19,4671.67%08/01/202003/15/2021
D215041165Produce Environmental Compliance DocumentationParticipate in ESA/NEPA Compliance for Yakima Basin M&EPrepare documentation in support of ESA/NEPA compliance regarding fisheries monitoring and evaluation activities in consultation and coordination with BPA environmental staff. This work element acknowledges that all activities regarding ESA/NEPA compliance will be coordinated with BPA environmental staff to ensure adequate compliance is in place prior to actions occurring. ESA/NEPA coordination is an on-going activity under this project and this WE documents the contractor's responsibility for supporting BPA's ESA/NEPA compliance for all activities under this contract. (This WE is intended to cover new activities - there is a series of existing ESA and NEPA compliance documents in place that cover all current activities.)$5,0000.43%05/01/202004/30/2021
E215042157Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab DataYakima Juvenile Spring Chinook Habitat Saturation and Limiting FactorsDevelop methods of detecting indices of increasing natural production, as well as methods of detecting a realized increase in natural production, with specified statistical power. Rationale: Even if supplementation produced smolts and adults are identical to wild fish in every way, project success could be limited if existing production actually represented the carrying capacity of the Yakima Subbasin. The long-term mean annual abundance of parr may increase because supplementation has the potential to fill the environment to capacity every year. Space and food competition can limit upper Yakima spring Chinook production. For example, the distribution of parr has not increased substantially despite having an increase in the number of spawners. Space and or food may be abundant in the Yakima River, but if they are biologically unavailable (e.g., flows are too fast) then they won’t benefit fish. Yakima River flows are managed by the Bureau of Reclamation and are abnormally high during the summer and abnormally low during winter months. Knowing what factors currently limit the capacity of the environment can help to interpret interannual variation in survival and focus habitat actions on increasing capacity.$150,00012.87%05/01/202004/30/2021
F215043162Analyze/Interpret DataAnalyze Spring Chinook Habitat Saturation and Limiting FactorsDevelop methods of detecting indices of increasing natural production, as well as methods of detecting a realized increase in natural production, with specified statistical power. Rationale: Even if supplementation produced smolts and adults are identical to wild fish in every way, project success could be limited if existing production actually represented the carrying capacity of the Yakima Subbasin. The long-term mean annual abundance of parr may increase because supplementation has the potential to fill the environment to capacity every year. Space and food competition can limit upper Yakima spring Chinook production. For example, the distribution of parr has not increased substantially despite having an increase in the number of spawners. Space and or food may be abundant in the Yakima River, but if they are biologically unavailable (e.g., flows are too fast) then they won’t benefit fish. Yakima River flows are managed by the Bureau of Reclamation and are abnormally high during the summer and abnormally low during winter months. Knowing what factors currently limit the capacity of the environment can help to interpret interannual variation in survival and focus habitat actions on increasing capacity.$40,0003.43%05/01/202004/30/2021
G215044157Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab DataYakima Spring Chinook Residual/Precocious Male MonitoringThe primary objective of this study is to evaluate the abundance and distribution of hatchery spring Chinook salmon precocious males during the spawning season in the Yakima River. The goal of the hatchery program in the Yakima River is to increase natural production and to provide harvest opportunity while keeping adverse genetic and ecological impacts within specified biological limits (Bonneville Power Administration 1996; Fast and Craig 1997; Bosch 2004). As such, the program strives to minimize differences between the hatchery and natural spawning fish to decrease the risk of long-term fitness impacts. Previous research indicated that the Yakima Supplementation and Research Facility has produced and released an average of 129,249 precocious males/year into the upper Yakima basin between 1999 and 2008 (Larsen et al. 2004a; Larsen et al. 2008; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Unpublished data). The estimate of precocious male abundance was derived by multiplying the percent of fish that exhibited physiological indicators of precocious maturation by the total numbers of fish released. It was not clear whether the spawning grounds would be swamped with large numbers of precocious males or whether these fish would die or fail to migrate to the spawning grounds prior to the spawning season. Our goals are to 1) estimate the abundance of hatchery origin precocious males on the spawning grounds, and 2) quantify the distribution of hatchery precocious males on and away from the spawning grounds.$40,0003.43%05/01/202004/30/2021
H215045162Analyze/Interpret DataAnalyze Spring Chinook Residual/Precocious MalesThe primary objective of this monitoring is to evaluate the abundance and distribution of hatchery spring Chinook salmon precocious males during the spawning season in the Yakima River. The goal of the hatchery program in the Yakima River is to increase natural production and to provide harvest opportunity while keeping adverse genetic and ecological impacts within specified biological limits (Bonneville Power Administration 1996; Fast and Craig 1997; Bosch 2004). As such, the program strives to minimize differences between the hatchery and natural spawning fish to decrease the risk of long-term fitness impacts. Previous research indicated that the Yakima Supplementation and Research Facility has produced and released an average of 129,249 precocious males/year into the upper Yakima basin between 1999 and 2008 (Larsen et al. 2004a; Larsen et al. 2008; Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project, Unpublished data). The estimate of precocious male abundance was derived by multiplying the percent of fish that exhibited physiological indicators of precocious maturation by the total numbers of fish released. It was not clear whether the spawning grounds would be swamped with large numbers of precocious males or whether these fish would die or fail to migrate to the spawning grounds prior to the spawning season. Our goals are to 1) estimate the abundance of hatchery origin precocious males on the spawning grounds, and 2) quantify the distribution of hatchery precocious males on and away from the spawning grounds.$20,0001.72%05/01/202004/30/2021
I215046157Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab DataDomestication Selection Research in the Yakima River BasinA comprehensive domestication and natural production monitoring plan has been developed and is underway for Upper Yakima spring Chinook. The performance of the supplemented Upper Yakima spring Chinook population (100% natural-origin broodstock), is compared to the performance of an Upper Yakima control line maintained under a regime of continuous hatchery culture, and to an unsupplemented wild control line in the neighboring Naches River. Performance is measured on several adult and juvenile traits that encompass virtually the entire range of domestication impacts noted in the literature. This work effort is shared by WDFW and YN. For the most part, YN will be responsible for data collection at the traps and spawning grounds and WDFW will be responsible for most of the data collection at the hatchery. Most of the analyses will be done by WDFW, but traits involving survival rates and natural production will be analyzed by YN.$210,00018.02%05/01/202004/30/2021
J215047162Analyze/Interpret DataAnalyze Domestication Selection DataA comprehensive domestication and natural production monitoring plan has been developed and is underway for Upper Yakima spring Chinook. The performance of the supplemented Upper Yakima spring Chinook population (100% natural-origin broodstock), is compared to the performance of an Upper Yakima control line maintained under a regime of continuous hatchery culture, and to an unsupplemented wild control line in the neighboring Naches River. Performance is measured on several adult and juvenile traits that encompass virtually the entire range of domestication impacts noted in the literature. This work effort is shared by WDFW and YN. For the most part, YN will be responsible for data collection at the traps and spawning grounds and WDFW will be responsible for most of the data collection at the hatchery. Most of the analyses will be done by WDFW, but traits involving survival rates and natural production will be analyzed by YN.$55,0004.72%05/01/202004/30/2021
K215048162Analyze/Interpret DataGenetics and Scale Lab Support for M&E in the Yakima River BasinUse genetic and aging tools to support whole river pedigree and natural production studies. Adult spring Chinook passing Roza dam will be assigned to parental cross. Smolts at Chandler will be assigned to their respective subbasin of origin to partition smolt outmigration. Adult scales from traps and spawning grounds will be aged to assign to brood year for run reconstruction. Scales from smolts will be aged to determine origin at Chandler trap (stream or ocean-type) to check the validity (size cut-off) of partitioning the outmigration by smolt size. Numbers of scale samples vary by species and year but normally total around 3,000 for all species.$301,13025.83%05/01/202004/30/2021
L215049157Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab DataEcological Interactions M&E in the Yakima River BasinSalmon supplementation and reintroduction programs have the potential to negatively impact other valued fish taxa, which are not the target of enhancement (non-target taxa of concern; NTTOC). We will develop and implement monitoring methods to determine if supplementation and enhancement efforts keep ecological interactions on NTTOC within prescribed limits and to determine if ecological interactions limit supplementation or enhancement success.$180,00015.44%05/01/202004/30/2021
M215050162Analyze/Interpret DataAnalyze Ecological Interactions DataDevelop and implement monitoring methods to determine if supplementation and enhancement efforts keep ecological interactions on non-target taxa of concern within prescribed limits, and to determine if ecological interactions limit supplementation or enhancement success.$55,0004.72%05/01/202004/30/2021
N215051158Mark/Tag AnimalsPIT tag juvenile O. mykissElectrofishing collection and PIT tagging of juvenile salmonids in the Teanaway River.$30,0002.57%05/01/202010/30/2020
O215052157Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab DataOperate PIT tag detector arrayOperate PIT instream array in the lower Teanaway River and submit detection data to PTagis database.$10,0000.86%05/01/202004/30/2021
      
$1,165,597
   

Deliverable Title WSE Sort Letter, Number, Title Start End Concluded
Manage and Administer Yakima Basin M&E B: 119. Manage and Administer Yakima Basin M&E 04/30/2021 04/30/2021
M&E Annual Report 2020 C: 132. Yakima Basin M&E Annual Report Jan-Dec 2020 03/15/2021 03/15/2021
EC Coordination D: 165. Participate in ESA/NEPA Compliance for Yakima Basin M&E 04/30/2021 04/30/2021
All data collected, validated and appropriately stored in WDFW Olympia & Ellensburg computers. E: 157. Yakima Juvenile Spring Chinook Habitat Saturation and Limiting Factors 04/30/2021 04/30/2021
Analysis and interpretation of habitat saturation and limiting factors data F: 162. Analyze Spring Chinook Habitat Saturation and Limiting Factors 04/30/2021 04/30/2021
All data collected, validated and appropriately stored in WDFW Olympia & Ellensburg computers. G: 157. Yakima Spring Chinook Residual/Precocious Male Monitoring 04/30/2021 04/30/2021
Analyze Residual/Precocious Male Data H: 162. Analyze Spring Chinook Residual/Precocious Males 04/30/2021 04/30/2021
All data collected, validated and appropriately stored in WDFW Olympia & Ellensburg computers. I: 157. Domestication Selection Research in the Yakima River Basin 04/30/2021 04/30/2021
Analyze Domestication Selection data J: 162. Analyze Domestication Selection Data 04/30/2021 04/30/2021
Analyze and interpret genetic samples and age of fish from scales K: 162. Genetics and Scale Lab Support for M&E in the Yakima River Basin 04/30/2021 04/30/2021
All data collected, validated and appropriately stored in WDFW Olympia and Ellensburg computer L: 157. Ecological Interactions M&E in the Yakima River Basin 04/30/2021 04/30/2021
Analyze Ecological Interactions data M: 162. Analyze Ecological Interactions Data 04/30/2021 04/30/2021
PIT tag juvenile salmonids in select locations N: 158. PIT tag juvenile O. mykiss 10/30/2020 10/29/2020
Operate PIT tag detector array O: 157. Operate PIT tag detector array 04/30/2021 04/30/2021

Viewing of Implementation Metrics
Loading...
Sort Order
WE ID
Work Element Name
Title
Description
Metric ID
Metric
End Fiscal Year
Planned
Actual
Contractor Comments
All Measures
Annual Progress Report Measures
Populations
Viewing of Environmental Metrics Customize
Loading...
WSE ID
WSE Start
WSE End
WE ID
Title
WSE Progress
Study Plan
Protocol
Category
Subcategory
Focus 1
Focus 2
Specific Metric Title

Primary Focal Species Work Statement Elements
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Mid-Columbia River Spring ESU
  • 5 instances of WE 157 Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data
  • 5 instances of WE 162 Analyze/Interpret Data
Chinook (O. tshawytscha) - Upper Columbia River Summer/Fall ESU
  • 1 instance of WE 162 Analyze/Interpret Data
Coho (O. kisutch) - Unspecified Population
  • 1 instance of WE 162 Analyze/Interpret Data
Steelhead (O. mykiss) - Middle Columbia River DPS (Threatened)
  • 2 instances of WE 157 Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data
  • 1 instance of WE 158 Mark/Tag Animals
  • 2 instances of WE 162 Analyze/Interpret Data
Cutthroat Trout, Westslope (O. c. lewisi)
  • 1 instance of WE 157 Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data
Trout, Bull (S. confluentus) (Threatened)
  • 1 instance of WE 157 Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data
Trout, Rainbow (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
  • 2 instances of WE 157 Collect/Generate/Validate Field and Lab Data

Sort WE ID WE Title NEPA NOAA USFWS NHPA Has Provisions Inadvertent Discovery Completed
A 185 Periodic Status Reports for BPA
B 119 Manage and Administer Yakima Basin M&E
C 132 Yakima Basin M&E Annual Report Jan-Dec 2020
D 165 Participate in ESA/NEPA Compliance for Yakima Basin M&E
E 157 Yakima Juvenile Spring Chinook Habitat Saturation and Limiting Factors 03/10/2020
F 162 Analyze Spring Chinook Habitat Saturation and Limiting Factors
G 157 Yakima Spring Chinook Residual/Precocious Male Monitoring 03/10/2020
H 162 Analyze Spring Chinook Residual/Precocious Males
I 157 Domestication Selection Research in the Yakima River Basin 03/10/2020
J 162 Analyze Domestication Selection Data
K 162 Genetics and Scale Lab Support for M&E in the Yakima River Basin
L 157 Ecological Interactions M&E in the Yakima River Basin 03/10/2020
M 162 Analyze Ecological Interactions Data
N 158 PIT tag juvenile O. mykiss 03/10/2020
O 157 Operate PIT tag detector array 03/10/2020